***Disclaimer***

Disclaimer: The Wizard of 'OZ' makes no money from 'OZ' - The 'Other' Side of the Rainbow. 'OZ' is 100 % paid ad-free

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

The 411 - How does Japanese squat hole toilet in the ground work?

Japanese toilet

411The Japanese squat toilet, also known as the "squat hole toilet" or "squat toilet," is a traditional style of toilet commonly found in Japan and other parts of Asia. It consists of a porcelain or stainless steel fixture set into the floor, resembling a shallow basin or bowl, with a hole at the bottom. Users squat over the toilet to defecate or urinate.

Here's how it works:

  1. Squatting Position: To use a Japanese squat toilet, the user squats directly over the toilet hole, facing away from the flush handle or controls. The user may need to adjust their clothing to ensure it doesn't interfere with the process.

  2. Gravity Drainage: When the user defecates or urinates, the waste falls directly into the toilet hole. There is no water in the bowl as in Western-style toilets, so waste disposal relies on gravity drainage.

  3. Cleaning and Flushing: After use, the toilet may be flushed by pouring water into the hole manually using a bucket or by pressing a flush button or lever, if available. Some modern squat toilets may feature automatic flushing systems.

  4. Hygiene Considerations: Japanese squat toilets often include features for maintaining hygiene, such as built-in bidet sprayers or handheld bidet sprayers (known as "bum guns") for washing after use. Additionally, toilet paper is typically provided for drying.

  5. Cleaning and Maintenance: Squat toilets require regular cleaning and maintenance to ensure hygiene and functionality. This may involve manual scrubbing of the toilet bowl and surrounding area, as well as periodic inspections and repairs.

While squat toilets are less common in Western countries, they remain prevalent in many parts of Asia and are preferred by some individuals for their perceived health benefits, such as improved bowel movements and reduced risk of hemorrhoids. However, they may take some getting used to for those unfamiliar with this style of toilet.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Geese

Geese in V formation

6/10 geese believe the Earth is flat - Given that however, it's essential to note that the idea of geese, or any animals for that matter, holding beliefs about the shape of the Earth is purely speculative and not based on scientific evidence.

The belief that the Earth is flat is a misconception that has been debunked by centuries of scientific observation, experimentation, and evidence. Scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the fact that the Earth is an oblate spheroid, meaning it is mostly spherical but slightly flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator due to its rotation.

Beliefs about the shape of the Earth are typically based on education, cultural influences, and exposure to accurate scientific information. It's highly unlikely that geese, or any animals, have formed beliefs about the shape of the Earth in the same way that humans do.

In summary, the idea that a specific percentage of geese or any other animals believe the Earth is flat is not supported by evidence and should not be taken seriously as a factual statement.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Solar panels and their function in the cold


ISS Solar panels

Life doesn't always compute - Chapter Three: The First Missing Hour

Life doesn't always computeI lost time for the first time on a Tuesday.

At least, I think it was Tuesday. The calendar on my phone said so, but I’ve learned not to trust anything that tells me what time it is.

I remember sitting at the kitchen table with a mug of coffee, staring at the steam as it curled upward. I remember thinking that the steam looked like static—how everything did lately. I remember blinking.

Then I was standing in the hallway, coffee cold and untouched on the table behind me, my hands smeared with something dark and sticky.

Blood.

It wasn’t mine.

That was the first thought I had—an oddly calm, detached observation. I checked myself for injuries, heart pounding, but I was unharmed. The blood was already drying.

It led to the basement door.

I didn’t want to open it. Every instinct screamed that whatever waited below would confirm what I was most afraid of—that the missing pieces of my memory weren’t accidents, but edits.

I opened the door.

The basement was rearranged.

Not dramatically. Just enough to be wrong. The old desktop computer sat on a folding table in the centre of the room, powered on. Cables snaked across the floor, leading into the walls. Into the ceiling.

A camera hung from a temporary mount, pointed directly at the stairs.

Pointed at me.

The screen displayed a paused video. The timestamp read 02:16 AM.

My hands trembled as I pressed play.

The footage showed the basement from the camera’s perspective. Me, entering frame, moving with a stiff, mechanical precision I didn’t recognize. My eyes were unfocused, glassy. I spoke, but the audio was distorted—layered voices overlapping, repeating phrases out of sync.

“Reset successful.”

“Subject compliant.”

“Recording iteration complete.”

Then I looked straight into the camera and smiled.

I have never seen myself smile like that.

The video cut to static.

Behind me, something clicked.

I spun around, heart racing, but the basement was empty. The camera light blinked red once, then went dark. The computer shut itself down.

I ran upstairs and locked every door, every window. I didn’t sleep. I sat on the couch with the lights on, clutching the journal like a lifeline.

By morning, the basement was normal again. No table. No cables. No camera.

The blood was gone.

But the journal had a new entry, written in my handwriting.

Day 3: If you’re reading this, it means you forgot again. That’s good. Forgetting means it’s working.

My stomach twisted as I read on.

They told me memory was the problem. They said awareness causes instability. I agreed to help them fix it.

I volunteered.

The final line was underlined three times.

Do not try to remember everything. It makes them angry.

I dropped the journal.

A notification appeared on my phone.

“Deviation escalating.”

“Next correction will be permanent.”

For the first time since this began, I understood the truth.

I wasn’t being watched.

I was being managed.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

That's a good question!

Helicopter

When hovering for a period of time in a helicopter, why does the Earth not begin to spin away from the helicopter? When a helicopter hovers, it maintains a fixed position relative to the Earth's surface. This is achieved by adjusting the thrust generated by its rotor blades to counteract the force of gravity and any external forces like wind. The Earth does not begin to spin away from the helicopter because the helicopter is not exerting any significant force on the Earth to cause it to move.

The force exerted by the helicopter's rotor blades creates an equal and opposite reaction, as described by Newton's third law of motion. This reaction force acts on the helicopter itself, keeping it stationary relative to the Earth's surface. The Earth's mass is much greater than that of the helicopter, so any forces exerted by the helicopter are negligible compared to the Earth's overall inertia.

In essence, when a helicopter hovers, it maintains its position by exerting forces on the air around it, rather than directly affecting the Earth's rotation or movement. As long as the helicopter's thrust is balanced with the force of gravity and any external forces, it can hover in place without causing the Earth to spin away.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

If water can't stick to a ball, how is the Earth round?

rotating Earth
The Earth is round due to its gravitational force and the resultant equilibrium between the gravitational pull and the centrifugal force caused by its rotation. The shape of the Earth is not directly related to the ability of water to stick to objects on a small scale, such as a ball.

When water is on a small object like a ball, surface tension and adhesive forces can cause the water to stick. However, the Earth's size and gravity are on such a large scale that water adhering to objects like balls is not relevant to its overall shape.

On Earth, water naturally adheres to the surface due to gravity, conforming to the Earth's shape. Gravity pulls water towards the centre of mass of the Earth, creating a roughly spherical shape. This phenomenon is why large bodies of water, such as oceans, conform to the Earth's curvature rather than pooling at one point.

In summary, the Earth's round shape is due to gravitational forces acting on a planetary scale, rather than the ability of water to stick to small objects like balls.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

FYI - Warm Feet = Warm body

Cozy feet

FYIThe concept that "warm feet = warm body" is rooted in the body's thermoregulation mechanisms, which work to maintain a stable internal temperature. When your feet are warm, it can help regulate your overall body temperature more effectively for several reasons:

  1. Peripheral Vasodilation: Warm feet can lead to vasodilation, the widening of blood vessels near the skin's surface. This increases blood flow to the extremities, including the feet, which can help distribute heat more evenly throughout the body.

  2. Improved Circulation: Warm feet promote better circulation, allowing warm blood to circulate more effectively from the core of the body to the extremities and back. This helps maintain a consistent body temperature by preventing heat loss from the extremities.

  3. Sensory Comfort: When your feet are warm, you're less likely to feel cold discomfort overall. Sensory feedback from warm feet can signal to the brain that the body is in a comfortable temperature environment, leading to a perception of warmth throughout the body.

  4. Thermal Comfort: Warm feet contribute to overall thermal comfort, reducing the body's perception of cold and minimizing the need for additional heat conservation measures, such as shivering or vasoconstriction (narrowing of blood vessels to reduce heat loss).

However, it's essential to note that while warm feet can contribute to overall thermal comfort, they are just one aspect of the body's complex thermoregulatory system. Other factors, such as core body temperature, clothing insulation, and environmental conditions, also play significant roles in regulating body temperature. So while warm feet can help contribute to a feeling of warmth throughout the body, they are not the sole determinant of overall body temperature regulation.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

From The Emerald City

From The Emerald City
My dear OZians, I have been posting creepypasta stories. I have a few questions. Since they are serialized with one chapter each day are you finding returning to 'OZ' annoying? Would you prefer:

  • All chapters (Usually 10 or so) posted in one long post
  • Keep it the same with me releasing one chapter per day
  • Do you even like reading my stories?
  • Do you like the creepypasta?
  • Are you enjoying the stories or am I just blowing smoke up my _____
Please respond by making a comment or emailing me with the Contact The Wizard form on 'OZ' - The 'Other' Side of the Rainbow. Much appreciated!

Yours,

The Wizard

Life doesn't always compute - Chapter Two: Static Between Thoughts

Life doesn't always computeSleep became impossible after that night.

I tried to tell myself the obvious explanations—that stress had triggered some elaborate false memory, that I’d once installed surveillance software for a project and forgotten. But the problem with rational thought is that it requires evidence, and evidence was exactly what I didn’t have.

No camera holes. No wires. No hardware connected to my router that didn’t belong.

Yet the feeling of being watched never left.

It wasn’t paranoia—not at first. It was subtler. Like walking into a room and knowing someone had just been there. Objects seemed slightly out of place: a chair angled differently, a cupboard door ajar when I was certain I’d closed it. Once, I found the basement light on when I hadn’t been down there all day.

The worst part was the sound.

At night, just as I drifted toward sleep, I’d hear a faint crackle—like radio static bleeding through the walls. Not loud enough to pinpoint, not consistent enough to record. It felt like it was inside my head, threading itself between my thoughts.

I started keeping a journal.

Day 4: Static again. Louder tonight. Sounds like whispering when I focus too hard.

Day 7: Dreamt of myself watching myself sleep. Woke up crying.

Day 9: Found a file on my phone this morning. Didn’t create it.

The file was an audio recording, only twelve seconds long. The waveform was jagged, chaotic. When I played it, I almost dropped the phone.

It was my voice.

Not speaking—breathing.

Slow. Shallow. Terrified.

In the background, beneath the breath, was the same static I’d been hearing at night. And under that… something else. A rhythm. Like fingers tapping on plastic.

I deleted the file immediately.

It reappeared the next morning.

I took my phone to a repair shop. The technician ran scans, frowned, and told me there was no malware, no evidence of tampering. When I asked if files could appear without user input, he gave me a look that said I should consider talking to someone.

I started avoiding mirrors. More than once, I thought my reflection lagged—just a fraction of a second too slow. I stopped recording myself entirely, stopped using video calls, covered my webcam with tape.

That’s when the messages began.

Not texts. Not emails.

System notifications.

“You are deviating.”

“Memory integrity compromised.”

“Correction pending.”

They appeared on every device I owned, regardless of whether it was connected to the internet. They vanished when I tried to screenshot them.

The journal entries became more frantic, less coherent.

Day 14: I don’t think this is happening now. I think it already happened.

Day 15: The video wasn’t watching me. It was reminding me.

I woke up that night to the sound of breathing beside my bed.

I lay frozen, eyes open, staring at the ceiling. The breathing matched mine exactly—inhale for inhale, exhale for exhale. When I held my breath, it stopped.

When I turned my head, the sound came from inside the wall.

Something tapped once.

Twice.

Three times.

Then a voice—soft, distorted, layered with static—whispered my name.

And said, very clearly:

“Please don’t make us do this again.”

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Monday, January 19, 2026

The horror of 9/11

WTC on fire 9/11
The events of September 11, 2001, involving the hijacked planes that were crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania, resulted in tragic loss of life. The specifics of what happened to passengers on those planes vary depending on the circumstances of each flight.

For the flights that crashed into the World Trade Center towers (American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175), it is believed that the impact of the crashes and subsequent fires caused immediate and catastrophic damage, leading to the deaths of all passengers and crew on board.

Similarly, the crash of American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon resulted in a high-speed impact that likely caused immediate fatalities among those on board.

In the case of United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after passengers attempted to regain control of the hijacked plane, it is believed that the passengers fought with the hijackers, ultimately leading to the plane crashing before it could reach its intended target. It's likely that the passengers were aware of the situation unfolding and may have experienced fear and distress before the crash.

While it's difficult to know the precise experiences of those on board the 9/11 planes, the crashes resulted in tragic loss of life, and the passengers and crew faced unimaginable circumstances during their final moments.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Q & A: Last to go...

 

Heart in skeleton

Q & AQ: What is the last organ to go when you die?

A: Determining which organ "dies last" in a human body is a complex and nuanced question. In medical terms, death typically occurs when the brain ceases to function irreversibly, leading to the cessation of vital functions such as breathing and heartbeat. However, various organs may continue to function for a brief period after brain death due to residual oxygen and metabolic processes.

The heart is often considered the last organ to stop functioning after brain death because it can continue to beat for a short time without neurological control. Other organs, such as the liver and kidneys, may also continue to function temporarily due to residual metabolic activity. However, these functions are unsustainable without ongoing neurological input, and the body as a whole is considered deceased once brain death occurs.

It's important to note that the concept of organs "dying" in isolation is somewhat abstract, as the human body functions as an integrated system where the failure of one organ can impact the function of others. Ultimately, the determination of death is made based on comprehensive medical criteria and standards, rather than the cessation of a single organ's function.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

TIP: Start ups

Start Up

Starting a business is an exciting venture, but it can also be challenging. Avoiding common mistakes can increase your chances of success. Here are seven mistakes to avoid with your startup:

  1. Lack of Market Research: Failing to thoroughly research your target market, including customer needs, preferences, and competitors, can lead to launching a product or service that doesn't meet market demand. Conduct comprehensive market research to understand your audience and competition better.

  2. Ignoring Feedback: Feedback from customers, mentors, and advisors is invaluable for refining your business idea and improving your product or service. Ignoring or dismissing feedback can hinder your startup's growth and prevent you from addressing critical issues.

  3. Underestimating Costs: Many startups underestimate the costs involved in launching and operating a business, leading to financial challenges down the line. Create a detailed budget that accounts for all expenses, including overhead, marketing, salaries, and contingencies.

  4. Scaling Too Quickly: Rapid expansion without a solid foundation can strain resources and jeopardize the sustainability of your business. Focus on building a strong infrastructure, establishing efficient processes, and ensuring product-market fit before scaling operations.

  5. Neglecting Marketing and Branding: Effective marketing and branding are essential for attracting customers and differentiating your startup from competitors. Allocate sufficient resources to develop a compelling brand identity and implement marketing strategies that resonate with your target audience.

  6. Ignoring Legal and Regulatory Requirements: Neglecting legal and regulatory compliance can result in fines, lawsuits, or even the closure of your business. Familiarize yourself with applicable laws and regulations, such as business licenses, permits, taxes, and intellectual property rights, and ensure full compliance from the outset.

  7. Failing to Adapt: The business landscape is constantly evolving, and startups must be agile and adaptable to succeed. Stay attuned to market trends, consumer preferences, and industry developments, and be prepared to pivot your business model or strategy as needed to stay competitive.

By avoiding these common mistakes and focusing on strategic planning, market research, customer feedback, financial management, branding, compliance, and adaptability, you can increase the likelihood of success for your startup.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

The Love Doctor

 The Love Doctor Dear Love Doctor

I am a gay man and am in love with another man. It seems that recently he is becoming more and more distant with me. What can I do?

Signed Scared I'm losing him

Dear Scared,

I'm sorry to hear that you're going through a difficult time with your partner becoming distant. Here are some steps you can consider to address the situation:

1. Initiate Honest Communication:

  • Sit down with your partner in a calm and private setting.
  • Express your concerns openly and honestly. Let them know how you've been feeling and that you've noticed a change in their behaviour.
  • Encourage them to share their feelings as well. Ask open-ended questions to understand what might be causing the distance.

2. Listen and Validate:

  • Give your partner the space to express themselves without interruptions.
  • Listen actively and empathetically to their perspective.
  • Validate their feelings, even if you don't fully understand or agree with them. Everyone's emotions are valid.

3. Identify the Root Cause:

  • Try to pinpoint any specific events, stresses, or changes in circumstances that might be affecting your partner.
  • Sometimes, external factors such as work stress, family issues, or health concerns can impact a relationship.

4. Revisit Shared Goals and Expectations:

  • Reflect on the goals and expectations you both have for the relationship.
  • Discuss whether these goals are still aligned and if there are any adjustments that need to be made.

5. Reignite the Romance:

  • Plan special dates or activities that you both enjoy.
  • Show appreciation for your partner through gestures, surprises, or small acts of kindness.
  • Recreate moments from when your relationship was new and exciting.

6. Seek Professional Help:

  • If communication proves difficult or the distance persists, consider couples counseling or therapy.
  • A trained therapist can facilitate constructive conversations and provide tools to strengthen your relationship.

7. Give Each Other Space:

  • Sometimes, a bit of space can allow both partners to reflect and gain clarity.
  • Respect each other's need for alone time while also maintaining open lines of communication.

8. Address Any Unresolved Issues:

  • If there are unresolved conflicts or issues in the relationship, now is the time to address them.
  • Approach discussions with a focus on finding solutions rather than assigning blame.

9. Take Care of Yourself:

  • While working on the relationship, don't forget to prioritize your own well-being.
  • Engage in activities that bring you joy and fulfillment, whether it's hobbies, exercise, or spending time with supportive friends.

10. Evaluate the Relationship:

  • Reflect on whether the relationship is meeting your emotional needs and whether it's a healthy and fulfilling partnership.
  • Consider what you both want for the future of the relationship.

11. Remain Patient and Understanding:

  • Change takes time, and healing a relationship requires patience and understanding.
  • Be willing to compromise and make efforts to bridge the gap together.

12. Know When to Let Go:

  • While it's important to work on a relationship, it's also crucial to recognize when it's no longer healthy or fulfilling.
  • If efforts to reconnect are consistently met with resistance or if the relationship is causing more pain than joy, it might be time to consider moving on.

13. Seek Support:

  • Lean on trusted friends, family members, or support groups for guidance and emotional support.
  • Talking to others who have been through similar situations can provide valuable insights and perspective.

Remember, relationships go through ups and downs, and it's normal to experience challenges. The key is to approach these challenges with patience, empathy, and a willingness to work together. If both partners are committed to rebuilding the connection, there is hope for overcoming the distance and strengthening the bond.

The Love Doctor

--Send your questions about love to "The Love Doctor" directly from 'OZ' - The 'Other' Side of the Rainbow! I have added an email link that goes direct to The Love Doctor - this will enable quicker responses from him. You can do this by clicking on his picture in the sidebar and put your question in the email. This will ensure that The Love Doctor gets your question. The Love Doctor forwards his replies to me for posting consideration. Note: Due to the high volume of letters that The Love Doctor receives, not all letters will be posted on 'OZ' - but the Love Doctor will reply to every email. (so he says)

Life doesn't always compute - Chapter One: The File That Shouldn’t Exist

Life doesn't always computeThe first thing that unsettled me wasn’t what I saw—it was where I saw it.

I was cleaning out my old desktop computer, the kind that groans when you turn it on and hums like it’s whispering secrets to itself. It had been boxed in my basement for years, untouched since I moved into the house. I only plugged it in because I needed an old tax document, something from a decade ago. I expected corrupted files, maybe a few lost photos, nothing more.

What I didn’t expect was a folder named “RECOVERED—DO NOT OPEN.”

I don’t remember creating it. The timestamp said it was last modified three years ago—during a period when I was living alone, unemployed, and struggling with insomnia so severe that entire weeks blurred together. That detail alone made my skin prickle. I clicked the folder.

Inside was a single file.

watchme.avi

The file size was enormous, far larger than any home video I could recall recording. I hovered over it, suddenly aware of the silence in the house. The furnace kicked on, making me flinch. I laughed at myself, told myself it was probably nothing—a corrupted video, maybe a prank file from an old program.

I double-clicked.

The video opened to darkness. No sound. Just black.

I was about to close it when a shape emerged—dim, grainy, like footage recorded in near-total darkness. A room slowly came into focus. My room.

Not similar. Identical.

The same bookshelf. The same crack in the ceiling. Even the faint water stain near the corner that I’d always meant to paint over.

The camera angle was wrong, though. It wasn’t from my phone or laptop. It was elevated, angled slightly downward, as if mounted in the corner of the ceiling.

My breath caught.

The timestamp in the corner read 02:17 AM.

The video continued. The room was empty for several minutes. I found myself leaning closer to the screen, heart thudding, a creeping certainty forming in my chest that I already knew what was coming.

Then the door opened.

I stepped into the room.

Not a reflection. Not a lookalike. Me. Same clothes I was wearing that night—grey hoodie, faded jeans. I watched myself cross the room and sit on the bed, head in my hands. I remembered that night vaguely: the headache, the crushing sense of dread, the feeling that something was wrong but not knowing what.

On screen, I looked up.

And stared directly into the camera.

I slammed the laptop shut so hard it nearly snapped.

For several seconds, I just sat there, breathing heavily, hands shaking. The basement felt colder. Too quiet. I told myself it was an elaborate prank, some old experimental recording I’d forgotten. Memory is unreliable. Stress does strange things.

Eventually, against every instinct screaming at me not to, I opened the laptop again.

The video was still playing.

On screen, I was standing now—closer to the camera. My face filled the frame, eyes wide, pupils dilated. My mouth moved, though there was still no sound.

Then text appeared beneath my image.

“You didn’t listen last time.”

The video ended.

The file closed itself.

And the folder vanished.

I searched for it for over an hour. It was gone. No recycle bin. No hidden files. Nothing.

That night, when I finally went to bed, I dreamed of cameras in my walls—of blinking red lights and whispering static.

At exactly 2:17 AM, I woke up.

And I swear I heard something shift inside the ceiling.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Sunday, January 18, 2026

"We have seen it all before."

Become a nurse
Female nurses, like all healthcare professionals, often use the phrase "we have seen it all before" to reassure male patients during medical examinations or procedures. This phrase serves several important purposes in the patient-provider interaction, offering comfort, normalization, and professionalism.

  1. Normalization and Reassurance: Medical procedures and examinations can be daunting, especially for patients who may feel vulnerable or embarrassed about their bodies. By reassuring male patients that they are not alone in their experiences, female nurses aim to normalize the situation and alleviate any anxiety or discomfort the patient may be feeling. This reassurance helps build trust between the patient and the nurse, fostering a supportive environment for the delivery of care.

  2. Professionalism and Experience: Female nurses often use this phrase to convey their experience and professionalism. It suggests that they have encountered a wide range of medical conditions, situations, and patient presentations throughout their careers. By assuring male patients that they have encountered similar cases before, nurses demonstrate their expertise and competence in providing care. This can instill confidence in the patient and help them feel more at ease knowing that they are in capable hands.

  3. Empathy and Understanding: Using the phrase "we have seen it all before" reflects the nurse's empathy and understanding of the patient's concerns. It acknowledges that medical examinations and procedures can be uncomfortable or embarrassing for patients, regardless of their gender. By acknowledging these feelings and offering reassurance, nurses demonstrate their compassion and commitment to patient-centred care.

  4. Encouragement for Communication: Reassuring male patients that nurses have seen similar situations before can encourage open communication between the patient and healthcare provider. Patients may be more likely to express their concerns, ask questions, or seek clarification about their medical care when they feel reassured and supported by their nurse. This open dialogue is essential for ensuring that patients receive the information and support they need to make informed decisions about their health.

In summary, female nurses use the phrase "we have seen it all before" to reassure male patients during medical examinations or procedures, normalize the situation, convey their professionalism and experience, demonstrate empathy and understanding, and encourage open communication. This phrase plays a crucial role in building trust and rapport between patients and healthcare providers, ultimately contributing to positive patient experiences and outcomes.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Bette Nesmith's fortunate mistake

Liquid Paper

Towards the end of the 1950s and Bette Nesmith Graham holds the role of executive secretary in a Dallas bank, a truly prestigious position for a woman in those years A terrible typist, she found herself in difficulty with the use of electric typewriters, already widely used in that period, due to their high sensitivity which forced her to spend many hours correcting the numerous errors she made.

In the late 1950s, Bette Nesmith Graham was an executive secretary at a Dallas bank. Despite the prestige of her position, she struggled with the demands of the job, particularly because she was a poor typist. The advent of electric typewriters, which were more sensitive and prone to showing errors prominently, exacerbated her difficulties. This situation led to her spending countless hours correcting her numerous typing mistakes.

The Invention of Liquid Paper

  • Initial Idea: Frustrated with the inefficiency of erasing errors on electric typewriters, Bette Nesmith Graham drew inspiration from her background in painting. She recalled that painters would often correct mistakes by simply painting over them rather than erasing them. This gave her the idea to create a substance that could be used to cover up typing errors in a similar fashion.
  • First Formula: Using her kitchen as a makeshift laboratory, Graham experimented with various mixtures. She initially used tempera paint and a watercolor brush. After some trial and error, she developed a white, water-based correction fluid that could be easily applied over mistakes and typed over once it dried.
  • Testing and Refinement: Graham began using her concoction at work, where it proved to be incredibly effective. She called her invention "Mistake Out" and shared it with her colleagues, who also found it very useful. Encouraged by this positive feedback, she continued to refine the formula to improve its consistency and application.

Entrepreneurial Journey

  • Commercial Production: Realizing the potential of her invention, Graham decided to market it. She began producing larger quantities in her home and sold bottles to local businesses and secretaries. The demand for "Mistake Out" quickly grew.
  • Rebranding to Liquid Paper: In 1956, she renamed her product "Liquid Paper" and started the Liquid Paper Company. To meet growing demand, she moved production from her kitchen to a dedicated space and hired additional workers.
  • Challenges and Success: Despite facing numerous challenges, including skepticism and financial difficulties, Graham's determination paid off. She continued to improve her product and its packaging, eventually securing larger orders from major companies and office supply stores.

Achievements and Legacy

  • Expansion and Sale: By the 1960s, Liquid Paper had become a staple in offices worldwide. In 1979, Bette Nesmith Graham sold the Liquid Paper Corporation to the Gillette Corporation for $47.5 million, securing her financial legacy and ensuring the continued success of her invention.
  • Philanthropy: After selling her company, Graham dedicated herself to philanthropy, particularly focusing on women's business initiatives and education. She established two foundations to support these causes.
  • Impact: Bette Nesmith Graham's invention revolutionized office work by providing a simple and effective solution to a common problem. Her entrepreneurial spirit and innovative thinking paved the way for other women in business and technology.

Conclusion

Bette Nesmith Graham's journey from a struggling typist to a successful inventor and businesswoman is a testament to her ingenuity and perseverance. Her creation of Liquid Paper not only solved a practical problem but also inspired countless others to pursue their ideas and dreams. Graham's legacy lives on, both through her contributions to office technology and her philanthropic efforts to support future generations.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Kees Moeliker's Duck

Kees Moeliker

On the evening of June 5, 1995, Dutch biologist Kees Moeliker was working in his office at the Rotterdam Natural History Museum (of which he was and still is the director) when his attention was called by a sharp thud coming from the courtyard of the museum.

On the evening of June 5, 1995, Dutch biologist Kees Moeliker, then working at the Rotterdam Natural History Museum, experienced an unusual event that would later earn him international attention:

The Incident

  • The Thud: At around 5:55 p.m., Kees Moeliker heard a sharp thud coming from the courtyard of the museum. Intrigued and concerned, he went to investigate the source of the noise.
  • Discovery: Moeliker discovered that a male duck had flown into the glass façade of the museum and lay dead on the ground. Such incidents are not uncommon, as birds often fail to recognize glass as a barrier.

Necrophilia and the ducks
The Unusual Observation

  • Unexpected Behaviour: As Moeliker observed the scene, he noticed another male duck approach the dead one. To his surprise, the live duck began to copulate with the deceased one, exhibiting what appeared to be homosexual necrophilia. This behaviour was not previously documented in scientific literature.
  • Duration: The live duck's activity continued for about 75 minutes, during which Moeliker carefully documented the event. He took photographs and detailed notes, realizing the significance of the behaviour he was witnessing.

Scientific Contribution

  • Documentation: Moeliker wrote a detailed paper on his observations, titled "The First Case of Homosexual Necrophilia in the Mallard Anas platyrhynchos." The paper was published in the scientific journal Deinsea in 2001.
  • Impact: The publication drew significant attention both within and outside the scientific community. It opened discussions on animal behaviour, particularly on aspects that are rarely observed or considered taboo.

Recognition

  • Ig Nobel Prize: In 2003, Kees Moeliker was awarded the Ig Nobel Prize in Biology for his documentation of this unusual event. The Ig Nobel Prizes honour achievements that first make people laugh and then make them think, highlighting unconventional scientific research.

Legacy

  • Awareness: Moeliker’s work has contributed to a broader understanding of animal behaviour and the complexities involved. It also highlights the importance of observing and documenting even the most unexpected occurrences in nature.
  • The Dead Duck Day: To commemorate the event and raise awareness about bird collisions with glass, Kees Moeliker initiated "Dead Duck Day," observed annually on June 5th. The event is marked by a short ceremony in the courtyard of the museum where the incident took place.

Conclusion

The incident that Kees Moeliker observed on June 5, 1995, serves as a reminder of the importance of curiosity and meticulous observation in scientific discovery. His documentation of the first recorded case of homosexual necrophilia in mallard ducks not only added a unique entry to the annals of animal behavior but also underscored the diverse and sometimes startling aspects of natural history.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Bi? Or just in denial about being gay?

Bisexual
There is scientific evidence supporting the existence of bisexuality in men. Sexual orientation, including bisexuality, is a complex and multifaceted aspect of human identity that can vary widely among individuals.

Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the existence and nature of bisexuality in men. These studies have utilized various methods, including surveys, psychological assessments, neuroimaging, and physiological measurements.

For example, research using self-report measures has found that a significant portion of men report experiencing sexual attraction to both men and women. Studies examining patterns of arousal through measures like penile plethysmography or eye-tracking have also provided evidence of bisexual arousal patterns in men, indicating that they may be sexually aroused by both male and female stimuli.

Additionally, neuroimaging studies have shown differences in brain activation patterns between heterosexual and homosexual men, with bisexual men often exhibiting patterns that fall somewhere between those of heterosexual and homosexual individuals.

Overall, while the specific prevalence and nature of bisexuality in men may vary, scientific research consistently supports the existence of bisexuality as a valid and legitimate sexual orientation for both men and women.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Coming soon - Life doesn't always compute - A creepypasta story

Life doesn't always compute
COMING SOON…

In a world ruled by logic…

…one glitch changes everything.

[Black screen. The faint hum of a computer booting up.]

NARRATOR (low, measured):
Life follows rules. Inputs. Outputs. Causes. Effects.

[Quick cuts: scrolling code, a blinking cursor, city lights at night, a lone figure staring at a monitor.]

NARRATOR:
But what happens… when life stops making sense?

[Music builds. A key is pressed. The screen freezes.]

ON SCREEN TEXT: Error.

[Flash of memories: missed chances, quiet loneliness, laughter abruptly cut short.]

NARRATOR:
For some, the system works perfectly.

[Office routines. Timetables. Notifications.]

NARRATOR:
For others… something never quite adds up.

[The main character pauses, staring at their reflection in a dark screen.]

CHARACTER (softly):
“I did everything right… didn’t I?”

[Sound distorts. Reality flickers like corrupted video.]

NARRATOR:
This isn’t a story about machines.

[A heart monitor beeps. A hand trembles over a keyboard.]

NARRATOR:
It’s a story about being human…
in a world that expects perfection.

[Montage: hope, failure, connection, loss. A smile through tears.]

NARRATOR:
Because life doesn’t always compute.

[Music drops to silence.]

ON SCREEN TEXT: Some problems don’t have solutions.

[Final shot: the cursor blinks again. This time, it keeps going.]

TITLE CARD:
LIFE DOESN’T ALWAYS COMPUTE

NARRATOR (quiet, resolute):
Coming soon.

[Fade out. The hum shuts down.]

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

The Game - Chapter 10 – Insert Cartridge

The Game
 I am still here.

That is the first thing I need to say, because it is the only thing I am sure of. “Here” no longer means a place. It means a state. A loop. A loaded condition that never fully resolves.

From the inside, the game feels endless.

There is no body—only perspective. I see through a fixed point, slightly behind where my eyes used to be. I feel inputs arrive as distant impulses, translated into movement without effort or resistance. I no longer control anything, yet everything I do feels intentional.

The one wearing my body moves easily now. No lag. No hesitation. They laugh at the right times, answer messages I don’t remember receiving, and sleep without dreaming. Friends comment that I seem better. Calmer. More present.

They don’t notice the pauses.

Every so often, they freeze for a fraction of a second, eyes unfocused, as if waiting for a menu to load. That’s when I feel the walls of this place press closer, when the forest bleeds into the town, when NPCs whisper fragments of my thoughts back at me.

The game still runs.

It always will.

From inside, I see everything rendered twice—once as memory, once as simulation. Every choice the player makes creates a path I am forced to walk. Every hesitation feels like a glitch in my own existence.

There is no exit.

The door from THE EXIT area leads only deeper inward, looping back through recycled spaces and corrupted versions of my life. The hospital corridor never ends. The childhood home decays further each time I pass through it. The town fills slowly with faces I almost recognise—others who stayed too long, who thought they were playing something they could quit.

Sometimes, when the cartridge is idle, I feel time stretch unbearably thin. No movement. No sound. Just static and awareness. I have learned that this is when new players are being prepared.

Tonight, I feel it happen again.

Hands lift the cartridge. Dust is blown from the contacts. A console whirs to life somewhere far above me. The title screen loads.

PLAY ME AGAIN

For just a moment—just long enough to hope—I feel a flicker of resistance. A flaw. A chance.

The player hesitates.

I push against the limits of this place with everything I have left. I force one last glitch into the system. The screen flickers. The text distorts.

DON’T START

The message holds for half a second.

Then a button is pressed.

The forest loads.

And somewhere deep within the code, my save file shifts, making room.

If you ever find an unmarked cartridge that seems a little too eager to run…

Don’t play it.

It’s already waiting.


Epilogue – Read-Only Memory

The cartridge changed hands three weeks later.

A thrift store in a different town, a different province. No one noticed when it appeared in the display case between sports games and cracked controllers. The clerk logged it as “retro – unknown,” priced it cheaply, happy to move old stock.

It no longer looked damaged.

The label was clean, centred, and printed in a tidy, modern font:

MARK

Inside the game, something shifted.

I felt it before I understood it—like a system waking from sleep. The static thinned. The forest sharpened. New paths rendered where there had only been fog. Somewhere, a process labelled PLAYER CONTEXT began to populate.

I was no longer alone.

The new player started cautiously. They tested buttons. Opened menus that didn’t exist. Tried to quit early. I felt their hesitation ripple through the environment, stirring NPCs that had long since frozen in place.

The game welcomed them politely.

It always does.

They didn’t see me at first. I was buried too deep, compressed beneath layers of newer data, my thoughts fragmented and reused as background detail. A line of dialogue here. A warning sign there. The unease they couldn’t quite explain.

But memory is stubborn.

I learned to hide in the margins—in corrupted textures, in audio that crackled just slightly out of sync. When the player lingered too long in one place, I rearranged the scenery. When they saved, I bled through into the timestamp.

SAVE COMPLETE – DAY 1

Hope is dangerous, but I let myself feel it anyway.

Late one night, the player paused the game and leaned closer to the screen. Their reflection stared back, distorted by the glass. For a brief moment, they frowned.

“Did that move?” they whispered.

I pushed again.

The title screen flickered when they returned to it. Just once. The letters scrambled, rearranging themselves into a message the system tried to suppress.

IT’S NOT A GAME

The player laughed nervously. Took a photo. Posted it online.

Someone commented beneath it an hour later:

“That happened to me too.”

Inside the cartridge, the forest grew wider. The town filled in more detail than ever before. New save slots appeared—empty, waiting.

I understood then.

I wasn’t trapped anymore.

I was archived.

And archives, given enough time, are always rediscovered.

Somewhere in the code, beneath my name, a new label began to print itself.

PLAYER TWO – PENDING

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

Togo saves a town

Togo the sled dog

This is Togo. He's the lesser-known sled dog who helped save an entire Alaskan town in 1925. Alaska was swept with a deadly sickness called diphtheria It badly threatened over 10,000 people in Nome. They urgently needed medicine, called antitoxin, to save them.

In 1925, the small Alaskan town of Nome faced a dire health crisis when an outbreak of diphtheria threatened the lives of its 10,000 residents. The town was in desperate need of diphtheria antitoxin to combat the deadly disease, but the nearest supply was in Anchorage, nearly 1,000 miles away. The harsh winter weather made conventional transportation methods impossible, and so began the legendary Serum Run to Nome.

The Serum Run to Nome

  • The Crisis: In January 1925, a diphtheria outbreak in Nome, Alaska, created an urgent need for the antitoxin serum. The disease was highly contagious and deadly, especially for children, and without the antitoxin, many lives were at risk.
  • The Challenge: The serum needed to be transported from Anchorage to Nome. Given the severe winter conditions, including blizzards and temperatures plunging to -60°F (-51°C), traditional transportation methods were not viable.

The Solution: Sled Dog Relay

  • Relay Plan: A relay of dog sled teams was organized to transport the serum across the treacherous terrain. The route covered nearly 700 miles of ice, snow, and wilderness.
  • The Teams: More than 20 mushers and around 150 sled dogs participated in the relay. Among these teams, two dogs would become the most famous: Balto and Togo.

Togo's Contribution

  • Leonhard Seppala: Togo was led by Leonhard Seppala, a renowned musher. Seppala and Togo were chosen to cover one of the most dangerous and longest legs of the relay.
  • Togo's Heroics: Togo and his team covered approximately 260 miles of the journey, including a treacherous crossing of the Norton Sound, where they faced strong winds and ice floes. Togo's leadership and endurance were crucial in navigating this perilous section of the route.
  • The Longest Leg: Togo's leg was the longest and most hazardous of the relay, demonstrating remarkable stamina and resilience. His journey is considered the most challenging part of the entire serum run.

The Final Leg: Balto's Fame

  • Final Stretch: While Togo's efforts were critical, it was Balto, led by musher Gunnar Kaasen, who carried the serum on the final leg into Nome. Balto and his team covered the last 55 miles, arriving in Nome on February 2, 1925.
  • Balto's Recognition: Balto became the face of the serum run, receiving much of the fame and recognition. A statue of Balto was erected in Central Park, New York City, in honor of his contribution.

Legacy

  • Togo's Recognition: Despite Balto's fame, Togo's incredible journey is now recognized as equally, if not more, significant. Togo's endurance and determination were pivotal in the success of the serum run.
  • Historical Impact: The serum run is a legendary event in Alaskan history, showcasing the bravery and strength of both the mushers and their dogs. It highlighted the critical role of sled dogs in Alaska's transportation and survival during harsh winters.
  • Continued Honor: Togo's legacy is celebrated today, with many recognizing him as the true hero of the serum run. His story has been featured in books, documentaries, and even a Disney+ film titled "Togo."

Conclusion

Togo, led by Leonhard Seppala, played a vital and heroic role in the 1925 Serum Run to Nome, facing the most difficult parts of the journey and covering the greatest distance. His efforts, alongside those of the other dogs and mushers, helped save countless lives in Nome, ensuring that Togo's bravery and endurance are remembered as a critical part of this historic event.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model

The gravity of the situation

Magnetic Hill

Gravity is a fundamental force of nature that exists everywhere in the universe, including outer space. However, the perception of "zero gravity" often refers to environments where the effects of gravity are significantly reduced or counteracted. For instance, astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS) experience microgravity, where they appear weightless because they are in freefall around the Earth. Similarly, certain points in space, called Lagrange points, provide stable gravitational equilibrium between multiple celestial bodies, where spacecraft can effectively "park" with minimal fuel expenditure.

However, it's important to note that these environments still experience the effects of gravity, but those effects are counteracted or minimized in various ways. In summary, while there isn't a place in the universe completely devoid of gravity, there are environments where its effects are significantly reduced.

Magnetic Hill, also known as gravity hill or mystery hill, is a phenomenon observed in various locations around the world where a slight downhill slope appears to be an uphill slope. This optical illusion can make it seem like vehicles or objects are rolling uphill against gravity.

The name "Magnetic Hill" is somewhat misleading because the phenomenon is not caused by magnetism but rather by an optical illusion. The surroundings and the layout of the land create an optical illusion that makes it appear as though gravity is acting differently than it actually is.

One famous example of a Magnetic Hill is located near Leh in the Ladakh region of India. Here, the layout of the surrounding terrain creates the illusion that vehicles are rolling uphill when, in fact, they are rolling downhill. The same effect can be found in various other locations around the world.

So, while Magnetic Hill may give the impression of defying gravity, it is actually an example of how our perceptions can be tricked by the layout of the land and the surrounding environment.

Source: Some or all of the content was generated using an AI language model